deceptive intent claim

• CURIE: gmeow:deceptiveIntentClaim
• IRI: https://blackcatinformatics.ca/gmeow/deceptiveIntentClaim
• Category: property
• Defined by: gmeow:slices/deception
• Box roles: CBox role, RBox role (What is this?)

An attributed, defeasible standpoint claim that the event was carried out with deceptive intent. The vantage is the assessor (who attributes the intent), not the deceiver; the claim carries gmeow:confidence and gmeow:wasAttributedTo. Intent is NEVER entailed by the reasoner — it is a contestable attribution that coexists with its denial (Principle 9).

Structure

Property shape: object property; gmeow:Event -> gmeow:StandpointClaim

Practical Pattern

Use gmeow:deceptiveIntentClaim from gmeow:Event to gmeow:StandpointClaim when the relationship itself belongs in the native GMEOW graph.

Common Companion Terms

gmeow:Event, gmeow:StandpointClaim

External Equivalences

Equivalent or closely aligned targets: crminf

Linkages

Generated from the canonical mapping DSL. SSSOM files are the generated public interchange form for term equivalences.

Term Equivalences

Usage Advice

Use when

• Use to attach an assessor's attribution that an event was deliberately deceptive — keeping intent OUT of the logic, as a confidence-weighted, attributed claim rather than an entailed fact (the lie/error/bullshit distinction turns on intent the reasoner must not decide).

Avoid when

• Avoid asserting intent as a global fact or boolean flag, and avoid putting the deceiver in the vantage — the vantage is the ASSESSOR; never let the reasoner entail deceptiveness (it is contestable and coexists with its denial, Principle 9).

How to use

• Mint a gmeow:StandpointClaim whose gmeow:vantage is the assessor, carry gmeow:confidence and gmeow:wasAttributedTo, and link it via gmeow:deceptiveIntentClaim; record a denial as a separate coexisting claim rather than negating this one.

Examples

• ex:event gmeow:deceptiveIntentClaim ex:intentAssessment.